| 1 |
>>>>> "TW" == Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
TW> Also, please just call it git-3.eclass as it is a major change; any |
| 4 |
TW> other form of naming will introduce confusion (eg. -r1 < -2), also we |
| 5 |
TW> probably shouldn't change git-2.eclass as even when masked it doesn't |
| 6 |
TW> seem like a good thing to break its current API and documentation as |
| 7 |
TW> well as what actually works in the Portage tree. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
+1 on all of that. git-3 is a better name than using -r1. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
And leave git-2 there for at /least/ a year. There are a LOT of out of |
| 12 |
tree git-2 users. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-JimC |
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6 |
Archives