1 |
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 11:40 -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote: |
2 |
> When HAL evaluated the usage of libpci the following issues were |
3 |
> identified: |
4 |
> 1) increased memory usage, to the point that HAL was not usable on the |
5 |
> OLPC project |
6 |
> 2) ABI breakage between patch revisions (i.e. x.y.z and x.y.z+1 were |
7 |
> not ABI compatible) |
8 |
> 3) no shared library |
9 |
> 4) the library calls exit() when it encounters an error in parsing it's |
10 |
> own pci.ids file which would kill the whole app using it. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> There might have been more. I don't remember. Refer to ML discussions |
13 |
> and refer to IRC logs with me. |
14 |
|
15 |
Begs the question why does HAL use libpci in the first place. |
16 |
|
17 |
Thanks |
18 |
|
19 |
Roy |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |