Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Roy Marples <uberlord@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Resolving HAL vs. pciutils/usbutils
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:15:41
Message-Id: 1193847134.6975.0.camel@uberlaptop.marples.name
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Resolving HAL vs. pciutils/usbutils by Doug Goldstein
1 On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 11:40 -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote:
2 > When HAL evaluated the usage of libpci the following issues were
3 > identified:
4 > 1) increased memory usage, to the point that HAL was not usable on the
5 > OLPC project
6 > 2) ABI breakage between patch revisions (i.e. x.y.z and x.y.z+1 were
7 > not ABI compatible)
8 > 3) no shared library
9 > 4) the library calls exit() when it encounters an error in parsing it's
10 > own pci.ids file which would kill the whole app using it.
11 >
12 > There might have been more. I don't remember. Refer to ML discussions
13 > and refer to IRC logs with me.
14
15 Begs the question why does HAL use libpci in the first place.
16
17 Thanks
18
19 Roy
20
21 --
22 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Resolving HAL vs. pciutils/usbutils "RĂ©mi Cardona" <remi@g.o>