| 1 |
On Tue, 2005-25-10 at 20:16 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:55:36 -0400 solar <solar@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> | Please do not put words in my mouth. I've already asserted to you |
| 4 |
> | several times that the definition of RDEPEND= is unclear and that we |
| 5 |
> | do infact need a new set of depend atoms. R=(runtime) not Buildtime |
| 6 |
> | for the NNth time. Till then please focus your efforts on something |
| 7 |
> | useful that does not break other peoples systems or projects. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Given the choice of possibly causing minor inconvenience to the embedded |
| 10 |
> people or outright breaking the tree for every single user, the sane |
| 11 |
> option is to keep the tree working. If embedded has a requirement for |
| 12 |
> better DEPEND specifications, why don't they start working on a GLEP? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Maybe I dont get the problem of the embedded people, but why don't they |
| 15 |
just rm -rf /usr/include (or INSTALL_MASK it) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Olivier Crête |
| 19 |
tester@g.o |
| 20 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 21 |
x86 Security Liaison |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives