1 |
On Saturday 26 July 2003 10:56 am, Håvard Wall wrote: |
2 |
> I believe gentoo-stats is already sampling a lot of the needed |
3 |
> information. An estimate could primarly be based on some "major" |
4 |
> factors; perhaps cpu-type and clock frequency. Then, if enough |
5 |
> statistics is available for the current architecture, on other settings |
6 |
> as well, sucb as -O flags and size of main memory (MAKEOPTS?). A kind of |
7 |
> hierarchical estimate... Could perhaps be hard to implement in practice |
8 |
> though (?). |
9 |
> |
10 |
> But I believe there probably is some limited set of factors that could |
11 |
> provide a reasonably good estimate. |
12 |
|
13 |
Whoever actually implements these ideas, please don't forget that you need a |
14 |
solution for capturing accurate stats on machines that use Portage's distcc |
15 |
support. Because otherwise, your stats will not be as accurate as you'd |
16 |
like. |
17 |
|
18 |
Best regards, |
19 |
Stu |
20 |
-- |
21 |
Stuart Herbert stuart@g.o |
22 |
Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ |
23 |
Upcoming packages list http://dev.gentoo.org/~stuart/packages/ |
24 |
|
25 |
GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu |
26 |
Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C |
27 |
-- |