1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Xavier Neys wrote: |
5 |
> Thierry Carrez wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
>> Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>>> Oh god help. This also points to another reason why this is not such |
11 |
>>> a good idea. Writing guideXML is a lot more work than writing an |
12 |
>>> e-mail format file (ciaran's proposed format for those who didn't |
13 |
>>> recognize it). |
14 |
>>> |
15 |
>>> Also having double files containing the same information is broken by |
16 |
>>> design. |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>> OK so there is two options : |
21 |
>> |
22 |
>> 1- every "news" requires a GuideXML/RST/whatever errata at a central web |
23 |
>> location |
24 |
>> Pros: |
25 |
>> - non-portage user can easily browse errata |
26 |
>> - consistency in documentation |
27 |
>> Cons: |
28 |
>> - work overhead for errata-writing dev |
29 |
>> |
30 |
>> 2- every "news" requires just a short text-based item, extra doc is |
31 |
>> optional |
32 |
>> Pros: |
33 |
>> - flexibility: short news don't require writing extra doc |
34 |
>> - external doc reuse: the documentation referenced in the news item can |
35 |
>> be some upstream upgrade doc when sufficient |
36 |
>> Cons: |
37 |
>> - lack of consistency and difficulty for non-portage users to browse |
38 |
>> |
39 |
>> We can have the best of both worlds if we find a way to reduce the work |
40 |
>> overhead to 0 (using some kind of news2errataXml translator ?). If we |
41 |
>> can't, I tend to favor the second solution... |
42 |
> |
43 |
> |
44 |
> Both can be done. |
45 |
> Posting news items on our front page can be done today, publishing |
46 |
> upgrade notes can be done today, grouping all upgrade documents in an |
47 |
> upgrade category on the main doc index (docs.gentoo.org) can be done |
48 |
> today, having upgrade.gentoo.org point to it can be done one hour later. |
49 |
> All of the above does not require a single line of code. |
50 |
> |
51 |
> I suppose the news snippets could also be integrated in |
52 |
> packages.gentoo.org, hopefully without requiring too much work. |
53 |
> |
54 |
|
55 |
Great, then I hope that the scope of the GLEP gets expanded to include: |
56 |
|
57 |
- - central website (ugrade.g.o or errata.g.o or whatever) |
58 |
- - external docs follow existing doc policy |
59 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
60 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
61 |
|
62 |
iD8DBQFDa4d82QTTR4CNEQARApNQAJ9RzRxl1y/KRd/5xhVh0gQuwU4OEQCdFofK |
63 |
pC5D+BbzmgOcSDdW3IookUs= |
64 |
=J44D |
65 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
66 |
-- |
67 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |