| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> User installs foo-1.1-r1 |
| 4 |
> Developer makes foo-1.1-r1.1 |
| 5 |
> foo-1.1* is removed from the tree |
| 6 |
> User syncs |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
How is this different from your suggestion |
| 9 |
(which you *claim* to be non-broken): |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
User installs foo-1.1-r1 |
| 12 |
Developer makes foo-1.1-r2 |
| 13 |
foo-1.1* is removed from the tree |
| 14 |
User syncs |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
In fact, the result is completely the same, |
| 17 |
no matter whether you have minor revisions or not, |
| 18 |
and no matter whether you have static or dynamic deps. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
What is *actually* broken here is that the user |
| 21 |
has installed a package which is not maintained |
| 22 |
anymore: *This* is what needs to be fixed. |
| 23 |
This issue is completely independent of static |
| 24 |
vs. dynamic deps. |
| 25 |
You misuse this problem as a strawman, only. |
Archives