Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps | ||
| Date: | Fri, 25 Jul 2014 01:32:04 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20140723143325.031947fb@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps by Pacho Ramos |
||
| 1 | On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 23:06:07 +0200 |
| 2 | Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > Maybe this could be solved by having two kinds of revisions: |
| 4 | > - One would rebuild all as usually (for example, -r1...) |
| 5 | > - The other one would only regenerate VDB and wouldn't change the |
| 6 | > installed files (for example, -r1.1) |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > But I am not sure if it could be viable from a "technical" point of |
| 9 | > view :( |
| 10 | |
| 11 | This in no way solves the problem. Consider the following course of |
| 12 | events: |
| 13 | |
| 14 | User installs foo-1.1-r1 |
| 15 | Developer makes foo-1.1-r1.1 |
| 16 | foo-1.1* is removed from the tree |
| 17 | User syncs |
| 18 | |
| 19 | -- |
| 20 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps | Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps | Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de> |