| 1 |
On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 19:05 -0500, Mike Doty wrote: |
| 2 |
> All- |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> We've had a discussion about sunrise and have reached a compromise. |
| 5 |
> Someone will summarize it later, I've attached the raw logs for now. |
| 6 |
> Until the council makes a firm decision about non-gentoo hosted |
| 7 |
> overlays, this will be the defining method of dealing with them. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
[snip log] |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Ok if I may chime in. Some people seem to have a problem with devrel |
| 13 |
enforcement of a council recommendation. As the council itself was |
| 14 |
never asked to make a hard decision on the fate of sunrise, but only |
| 15 |
asked to discuss it. We the council discussed it and made a soft |
| 16 |
recommendation. So to me it appears that devrel is doing it's job and |
| 17 |
is perfectly within bounds in the following up of council |
| 18 |
recommendation till such time as sunrise matures enough to be |
| 19 |
re-evaluated. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
With respects to Gentoo trademarks. That is a foundation issue and |
| 22 |
would have to be raised with them. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 26 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives