1 |
On Monday 06 August 2001 00:22, you wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, 5 Aug 2001 15:22:06 -0600 Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o> |
3 |
> |
4 |
> wrote: |
5 |
> > On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 03:22:51PM +0000, Collins Richey wrote: |
6 |
> > > The source in /usr/tmp/portage/sylpheed-0.5.2/work/sylpheed-0.5.2 |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > looks |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > > normal, and there is a configure file. |
11 |
> > > |
12 |
> > > Any clues? |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > Yes; the S= setting has a trailing period. |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > -- |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Thanks. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> The only delta required from sylpheed-0.5.0.ebuild to ...0.5.2.... are the |
21 |
> following lines. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> A=${PN}-0.5.2.tar.bz2 |
24 |
> S=${WORKDIR}/${PN}-0.5.2 |
25 |
> |
26 |
> I am using gentoo_rc5 with portage 1.5.2 and a default /etc/make.conf. |
27 |
> Someone might want to look and see if it builds with other use and/or cpu |
28 |
> options, although I doubt any problems - I've never had any problems with |
29 |
> sylpheed incremental releases. |
30 |
OK, sorry about not responding yesterday - I was asleep (different time |
31 |
zones). Anyway, I'll add this to incoming, hopefully since it's just an |
32 |
update it'll be into cvs in a day or two. |
33 |
|
34 |
BTW, drobbins, IMHO we should do something special with incoming updates, |
35 |
since they can be checked in and tested quicker than a new ebuild, but only |
36 |
by the original ebuild's author or someone who knows the package well. Maybe |
37 |
a change in dev-wiki - adding items to other developers (maybe only for |
38 |
incoming) or, failing that, having all unassigned team todos show up on the |
39 |
main team page. What do you think? Maybe I'm just making too much o the |
40 |
incoming buisiness? |
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
|
46 |
Dan Armak |
47 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team |
48 |
Matan, Israel |