Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo 0.5.2.ebuild failure
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2001 00:07:37
Message-Id: 01080609084806.00616@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo 0.5.2.ebuild failure by Dan Armak
1 On Monday 06 August 2001 08:18, you wrote:
2 > On Monday 06 August 2001 00:22, you wrote:
3 > > On Sun, 5 Aug 2001 15:22:06 -0600 Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o>
4 > >
5 > > wrote:
6 > > > On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 03:22:51PM +0000, Collins Richey wrote:
7 > > > > The source in /usr/tmp/portage/sylpheed-0.5.2/work/sylpheed-0.5.2
8 > > >
9 > > > looks
10 > > >
11 > > > > normal, and there is a configure file.
12 > > > >
13 > > > > Any clues?
14 > > >
15 > > > Yes; the S= setting has a trailing period.
16 > > >
17 > > > --
18 > >
19 > > Thanks.
20 > >
21 > > The only delta required from sylpheed-0.5.0.ebuild to ...0.5.2.... are
22 > > the following lines.
23 > >
24 > > A=${PN}-0.5.2.tar.bz2
25 > > S=${WORKDIR}/${PN}-0.5.2
26 > >
27 > > I am using gentoo_rc5 with portage 1.5.2 and a default /etc/make.conf.
28 > > Someone might want to look and see if it builds with other use and/or cpu
29 > > options, although I doubt any problems - I've never had any problems with
30 > > sylpheed incremental releases.
31 >
32 > OK, sorry about not responding yesterday - I was asleep (different time
33 > zones). Anyway, I'll add this to incoming, hopefully since it's just an
34 > update it'll be into cvs in a day or two.
35 >
36 Sorry about the multipart messaging. Since this is a quick and easy change
37 I'm not adding any files to incoming, just a quick note to dev-wiki for the
38 corresponding team.
39
40
41 --
42
43 Dan Armak
44 Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team
45 Matan, Israel