Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: flag-o-matic.eclass | ||
| Date: | Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:01:37 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20080218220127.56028c0d@snowcone | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: flag-o-matic.eclass by Donnie Berkholz |
||
| 1 | On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:54:34 -0800 |
| 2 | Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage/main/trunk/bin/isolated-functions.sh?r1=9118&r2=9140 |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > Alright, so portage has put this stuff to stderr since January 4. |
| 6 | > Then why are we also adding workarounds to individual eclasses? |
| 7 | |
| 8 | How many people are running a Portage version released after January 4? |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: flag-o-matic.eclass | Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> |