Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: flag-o-matic.eclass

[Donnie Berkholz]

On 21:37 Mon 18 Feb     , Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:20:52 -0800
> Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote:
> > This seems like something ewarn should do on its own.
>
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage/main/trunk/bin/isolated-functions.sh?r1=9118&r2=9140

Alright, so portage has put this stuff to stderr since January 4. Then 
why are we also adding workarounds to individual eclasses?

> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/eclass/flag-o-matic.eclass?rev=1.121&view=markup

I'm not sure what I'm supposed to get out of this, besides seeing that a 
lot of stuff is sent to stderr.

> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/194929

Right, I figured the reason was something along the lines of info going 
to stdout when only flags should.
-- 
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list