| 1 |
2008/6/6 Samuli Suominen <drac@g.o>: |
| 2 |
> Fri, 6 Jun 2008 01:48:03 +0100 |
| 3 |
> "Richard Brown" <rbrown@×××××××.org> kirjoitti: |
| 4 |
> That's right. When a developer has certain amount of technical |
| 5 |
> and /non-trivial/ commits to the tree why should he explain himself |
| 6 |
> over and over again? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I'm sorry, it's my mistake. I thought we were discussing who would be |
| 9 |
suitable to be elected to the council on the basis of merit, not on |
| 10 |
who can commit the most. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> Please, don't waste time of developers on nonsense politics. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Please, don't conflate cia stats with the the qualities that should be |
| 15 |
a prerequisite of council membership. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
With each of the people who has previously served on the council, you |
| 18 |
need to examine what that person achieved within the council. Does it |
| 19 |
really matter what the person did outside of their council work, since |
| 20 |
they could have done that without being on the council? |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Richard Brown |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives