| 1 |
Fri, 6 Jun 2008 01:48:03 +0100 |
| 2 |
"Richard Brown" <rbrown@×××××××.org> kirjoitti: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Josh Saddler <nightmorph@g.o> |
| 5 |
> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > £ukasz Damentko wrote: |
| 7 |
> >> |
| 8 |
> >> Hi guys, |
| 9 |
> >> |
| 10 |
> >> Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2008/2009 are open now and will |
| 11 |
> >> be open for the next two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 18/06/2008). |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > Now that nominations are officially open, I nominate the current |
| 14 |
> > council members (again): |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> This was the first of many nominations for the incumbent council that |
| 17 |
> gave no reason as to why they should be voted for in this election, as |
| 18 |
> several of them have accepted their nominations with no further |
| 19 |
> qualification, and flameeyes seems to think himself above having to |
| 20 |
> justify why he should be elected, so I provide, for your |
| 21 |
> entertainment, the following blog posts: |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
That's right. When a developer has certain amount of technical |
| 24 |
and /non-trivial/ commits to the tree why should he explain himself |
| 25 |
over and over again? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Please, don't waste time of developers on nonsense politics. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Thanks, Samuli |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives