Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Greg KH <gregkh@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: linux-usb-devel@×××××××××××××××××.net
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.6.11-gentoo-r7: If USB core API (usbcore) is built-in, it conflicts with the rest of usb-dependent modules
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 21:44:44
Message-Id: 20050511214446.GA11712@kroah.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.6.11-gentoo-r7: If USB core API (usbcore) is built-in, it conflicts with the rest of usb-dependent modules by Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro
1 On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 11:27:42PM +0200, Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
2 > El mi?, 11-05-2005 a las 13:12 -0700, Greg KH escribi?:
3 > > On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 09:10:46PM +0200, Lorenzo Hernandez Garcia-Hierro wrote:
4 > > > Hi,
5 > > >
6 > > > After some talk to gregkh, I've decided to send this message as it might
7 > > > give some light regarding the breakage of the USB modules when usbcore
8 > > > is built-in instead of compiled as module.
9 > > >
10 > > > Modules that are breaking with CONFIG_USB=y :
11 > > >
12 > > > - audio, bfusb, bcm203x, bpa10x, hci_usb, usblp, usb-midi, cdc_acm,
13 > > > uhci-hcd, ohci-hcd, ehci-hcd, usb-storage...
14 > > >
15 > > > For those, the core API symbols that follow are missing as of the
16 > > > built-in selected option:
17 > >
18 > > This should work just fine, care to attach your .config?
19 >
20 > Attached is my .config for -hardened-r1 which is basically a gentoo
21 > sources without fbsplash patch and some security-related patches
22 > applied, from the Hardened Gentoo project.
23 >
24 > This one takes CONFIG_USB=m but no host controller drivers nor class
25 > drivers will be able to get registered (the case is getting even more
26 > strange...):
27
28 Well, can you duplicate this against a clean 2.6.12-rc4 or 2.6.11.8
29 kernel? I don't trust the hardened gentoo kernel patches at all...
30
31 thanks,
32
33 greg k-h
34 --
35 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies