1 |
* Micha?? G?rny <mgorny@g.o> schrieb: |
2 |
|
3 |
> > I don't want to repeat all the arguments, why these Windows-imitator |
4 |
> > guys are completely wrong, anymore. (IMHO already been said in this |
5 |
> > thread). |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Yes, having a single locations for all applications is so-windows. We |
8 |
> should go the other way then, and create a separate prefix for every |
9 |
> application. I wonder why we removed that awesome /usr/X11R6. |
10 |
|
11 |
I was talking about other things, like giving up the typical |
12 |
unix-style separation of subsystems, all the bloating happening |
13 |
in certain DE's and then pulling down that bloat to the system |
14 |
level (just starting w/ dbus) |
15 |
|
16 |
> > If upstream really wants to stick in that silly chance, it's time for |
17 |
> > a fork. We're already allocating about 20..30hrs per week beginning |
18 |
> > with 2012/2 for such a project in our resource plan. This stupidity |
19 |
> > can become really dangerous thousands of systems around the world, |
20 |
> > so it needs to be stopped. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Wow, an enterprise fork taking 20-30 hrs per week to reimplement hacks |
23 |
> necessary for running applications randomly spread over filesystems? |
24 |
|
25 |
This is just our donation, I'm hoping others will join in. |
26 |
For the actual development, half of the resources should be |
27 |
fine, but testing dozens of uncommon scenarios will eat up |
28 |
a multiple of that. |
29 |
|
30 |
> > BTW: the original argument (AFAIK) is that moving everything to |
31 |
> > /usr should somehow make maintenance easier. Well, how actually ? |
32 |
> > Perhaps for people who are too lazy to backup a few more directories ? |
33 |
> > Silly. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Enjoy sharing those few more directories over NFS. |
36 |
|
37 |
Yes, what's the big deal ? Done that with thousands of nodes. |
38 |
|
39 |
> > Actually, at this point, I'd raise the question why not dropping |
40 |
> > /usr instead (in little steps). The impact is practically the |
41 |
> > same (well, replaces the risk of unbootable system by the risk |
42 |
> > of filling up separated / filesystems) but would remove an |
43 |
> > then obsolete additional directory. ;-O |
44 |
> |
45 |
> That's because people would like to get rid of additional directories |
46 |
> in /, not introduce additional ones. |
47 |
|
48 |
Aha. Then why not also moving /home, /etc and /var to /usr, too ? ;-o |
49 |
(hmm, some mindless jerks really could pick up that silly idea...) |
50 |
|
51 |
|
52 |
cu |
53 |
-- |
54 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
55 |
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/ |
56 |
|
57 |
phone: +49 36207 519931 email: weigelt@×××××.de |
58 |
mobile: +49 151 27565287 icq: 210169427 skype: nekrad666 |
59 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
60 |
Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme |
61 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------- |