1 |
150107 William Hubbs wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 06:49:56AM -0500, Philip Webb wrote: |
3 |
>> 150106 William Hubbs wrote: |
4 |
>>> Many packages have been masked in the tree for months - years |
5 |
>>> with no signs of fixes. I am particularly concerned |
6 |
>>> about packages with known security vulnerabilities |
7 |
>>> staying in the main tree masked. If people want to keep those packages, |
8 |
>>> I don't want to stop them, but packages like this should be in an overlay, |
9 |
>>> not the main tree. |
10 |
>> -- snip -- |
11 |
>> > # Tavis Ormandy <taviso@g.o> (21 Mar 2006) |
12 |
>> > # masked pending unresolved security issues #125902 |
13 |
>> > games-roguelike/nethack |
14 |
>> -- snip -- |
15 |
>> This one is perfectly safe on a single-user system : please leave it there. |
16 |
> I'm not opposed to it staying in the tree under one of these conditions: |
17 |
> 1) fix it and remove the mask or |
18 |
|
19 |
I'm a user, not a dev or a programmer. |
20 |
|
21 |
> 2) remove the mask and add ewarns to the ebuild |
22 |
|
23 |
That looks more reasonable & something a dev could easily do. |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
========================,,============================================ |
27 |
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb |
28 |
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto |
29 |
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca |