| 1 |
On 09/25/2012 05:36 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:30:07 +0200 |
| 3 |
> hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> On 09/25/2012 05:25 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: |
| 6 |
>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:17:07 +0200 |
| 7 |
>>> hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 10 |
>>>> Hash: SHA1 |
| 11 |
>>>> |
| 12 |
>>>> On 09/25/2012 05:10 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 13 |
>>>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:04:55 +0200 hasufell <hasufell@g.o> |
| 14 |
>>>>> wrote: |
| 15 |
>>>>>> Do we need an implementation beforehand? Afaik zac said that the |
| 16 |
>>>>>> implementation would not be very complicated, so why not vote on |
| 17 |
>>>>>> this now/soon? |
| 18 |
>>>>> |
| 19 |
>>>>> Well we can't really compare it to SDEPEND (which is implemented |
| 20 |
>>>>> in Paludis, for kdebuild-1 and exheres-0) without at least a |
| 21 |
>>>>> half-arsed implementation. |
| 22 |
>>>>> |
| 23 |
>>>>> Also, speaking as someone who *has* implemented this kind of |
| 24 |
>>>>> thing, I have extreme doubts as to the viability of the proposal. |
| 25 |
>>>>> So I'd be extremely wary of voting in favour of it until we've |
| 26 |
>>>>> been able to have a play with an implementation. |
| 27 |
>>>>> |
| 28 |
>>>> |
| 29 |
>>>> sorry? |
| 30 |
>>>> |
| 31 |
>>>> I don't see an answers to any of my questions. |
| 32 |
>>> |
| 33 |
>>> he wants an implementation beforehand :) |
| 34 |
>>> |
| 35 |
>> |
| 36 |
>> Is he a council member? |
| 37 |
>> |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> That doesn't prevent him from talking from past experiences and giving |
| 40 |
> his opinion. Council is free to ignore his request also. |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
Yeah, I thank him for that, but the time for user opinions has passed. I |
| 44 |
am asking what is preventing the _council_ from reviewing this or why |
| 45 |
the _author_ of that GLEP hasn't requested it for the next council meeting. |
Archives