Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Nathan L. Adams" <nadams@××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 02:02:50
Message-Id: 436ABEF2.8000602@ieee.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting by "Stephen P. Becker"
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Stephen P. Becker wrote:
5 >> *ALL* of the official docs are GuideXML; Gentoo *expects* users to have
6 >> a web browser by default. Otherwise a vast majority of users would never
7 >> get Gentoo installed in the first place. The "lightweight" requirement
8 >> appears to just be your way of subverting the current documentation
9 >> standards (because of your XML hatred).
10 >
11 >
12 > How about getting some facts straight before running your mouth? Gentoo
13 > most certainly does not expect users to have a web browser to install.
14 > The last time I actually installed on x86 (which was some time ago
15 > admittedly), there was a .txt version of the install guide on the livecd.
16 >
17 > Even then, the web browser you are speaking of runs directly off the
18 > livecd. So, what happens when there is critical news to be read during
19 > the install phase inside the chroot, but no web browser is yet
20 > installed? Are you suggesting we bloat stage1 and stage2 with some sort
21 > of XML parser so that the user can read news without having to kill the
22 > emerge and read the news outside the chroot? I think you would have a
23 > seriously hard time convincing the release folks this is a good idea.
24 >
25 > Furthermore, it is not possible to include any sort of XML parser with
26 > installers for certain arches which use very minimal netboots for the
27 > default installation method. So really, your complaints about the
28 > "lightweight" requirement appears to just be a way of subverting
29 > attention away from the real reasons it is a good idea, and towards
30 > maintaining a flamewar with ciaran that you will surely lose.
31 >
32
33 Let me say it one more time. I'm not saying you have to have a web
34 browser installed on the system that you are updating or installing. I'm
35 saying that the GuideXML docs are the standard, official source of
36 documentation and the same should hold true for the migration guides.
37 I'm also saying that feedback from users said they want ONE official
38 place to find this stuff. Therefor any plan that doesn't take both of
39 those things into account is silly. And having the GuideXML-ized guides
40 on a central website marked as the 'official-one-stop-for-errata' does
41 not in any way shape or form preclude anyone from mirroring that info in
42 a text file, forum post, emerge --news, mailing list, etc. etc. ad nauseum.
43 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
44 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
45
46 iD8DBQFDar7y2QTTR4CNEQARAkK2AJ9W+uofXxiuNc86gzsfHISvD7XkPgCeMeue
47 kDgucVFWYYLAb74WbcLQWpM=
48 =6A4p
49 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
50 --
51 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>