| 1 |
On 05/05/2016 09:44 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 05/05/16 08:32, Patrick Lauer wrote: |
| 3 |
>> To summarize: Lots of churn, no visible benefit, except that some OCD |
| 4 |
>> people could feel better: except that we can't actually fix the core |
| 5 |
>> 'issue' without making lots of other people very sad. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> Y'all have too much free time ... ;) |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
> I'm inclined to say, that provided there *is* someone doing it .. let |
| 11 |
> them be. Whatever the motives. |
| 12 |
This ignores the externalized cost for potentially thousands of users |
| 13 |
that have to fix stuff because it was actively broken. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
How much is your time worth? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> We have enough problems with painting the bike shed not to stifle |
| 19 |
> activity and contribution ... |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I dislike repeating myself, but ... "Change is not Progress" |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Just my 2c ... ;] |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> MJE |
| 26 |
> |
Archives