| 1 |
On Mon, 12 May 2008 02:58:55 +0200 |
| 2 |
flameeyes@×××××.com (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò) wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> - bison and flex should get out of the system package set, what |
| 5 |
> clearer than moving them out of sys-*? They are not so commonly used |
| 6 |
> so there should no compelling reason to have them installed on every |
| 7 |
> system; |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
both are required to build our toolchain. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> - gdb is not part of the system, this might be a problem for |
| 12 |
> crossdev...; |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
it's part of the sourceware tree. i think it should stay in sys. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> sys-devel/patch -> app-text/patch |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
:( |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> sys-devel/gettext -> app-i18n/gettext (well, it's part of system for |
| 21 |
> G/FBSD, but I'd rather have deps expressed properly...) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
:( (ok, less so than the one above) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
> sys-devel/distcc -> dev-util/distcc |
| 26 |
> sys-devel/icecream -> dev-util/icecream |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
sys-cluster? |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
> Yes these are a lot of moves, sincerely I think sys-* categories are a |
| 33 |
> bit bloated as they are, and I suppose we should start moving the |
| 34 |
> things around rather than waiting forever ad ever.. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
I guess I don't see the point. If you do move them, don't forget about |
| 37 |
documentation changes. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
fonts, gcc-porting, by design, by neglect |
| 42 |
mips, treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect |
| 43 |
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |
Archives