1 |
Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> When I think about where Gentoo was when we turned into a democracy |
4 |
> years ago, and where Gentoo is now, I don't see much of a difference on |
5 |
> the large scale. We lack any global vision for where Gentoo is going, we |
6 |
> can't agree on who our audience is, and everyone's just working on |
7 |
> pretty much whatever they feel like. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> When I joined, Daniel Robbins was in charge, period. Seemant Kulleen and |
10 |
> Jon Portnoy were basically his lieutenants. What Daniel said was what |
11 |
> happened, and woe to anyone who angered him. This generally worked out |
12 |
> pretty well, but _as Gentoo grew, it didn't scale_. Everything |
13 |
> significant still had to go through Daniel for personal approval. |
14 |
|
15 |
While I'm not a developer, I was thinking along similar lines some time ago. |
16 |
Or make it like a year ago? Good leadership is important in many undertakings |
17 |
of the real life, including (but not limited to) open-source projects. |
18 |
|
19 |
After some time spent using Gentoo some comparisons against other known |
20 |
projects naturally came to my mind. Linux kernel, Debian, PCLinuxOS - they |
21 |
were first to think about. From these I concluded that in some brilliant |
22 |
cases a project with a strong leadership, not fearing to make unpopular |
23 |
decisions sometimes, progresses ahead nicely in the long run. From the |
24 |
aforementioned three, Debian with its social contract, goals and the way it |
25 |
is maintained is an exceptional phenomenon. It seems to me that the key to a |
26 |
success lies in a good, respectful leadership, trust and good communication. |
27 |
|
28 |
I'm sure that at least some of you read kerneltrap, but this recent topic |
29 |
concerning NetBSD future (or lack thereof?) has some sad truths in it [1]. |
30 |
|
31 |
While I do not fear end of the Gentoo project (far from it!) I too sense |
32 |
some lack of a general vision of where is it going now. Not delving into |
33 |
philosophical considerations of democracy vs dictatorship I feel that the |
34 |
current democracy approach Gentoo utilizes makes sense. But there are many |
35 |
examples of healthy democracies, where citizens are seriously involved in |
36 |
the process (western Europe countries, in general) as well as weak |
37 |
democracies, where even though the process exists citizens feel powerless |
38 |
(like in some new democracies in eastern Europe countries). |
39 |
|
40 |
I suppose that there is a way that Gentoo can follow, only that its leaders, |
41 |
developers and users need to see it clearly. Is there a publicly visible |
42 |
page that contains current goals for new releases? Where all sub-project |
43 |
leaders could add their own goals, coherent with the general vision? |
44 |
I couldn't find it, but maybe I haven't looked in the right places? |
45 |
And if it doesnt' exist I am convinced that it should be created, say, for |
46 |
2007.0 release at least. Ubuntu has such plans, for one, so all developers |
47 |
and users are able to learn what to expect from the upcoming release. |
48 |
It also serves as a check list of what the expected goals were and what the |
49 |
outcome was. |
50 |
|
51 |
Maybe I should raise such concerns to the User Representatives first, but |
52 |
the overall flow of ideas was IMO rather worth to be sent to the mailing |
53 |
list in a complete form. If you feel otherwise, I apologize. |
54 |
|
55 |
With best regards, |
56 |
Wiktor Wandachowicz |
57 |
|
58 |
[1] NetBSD: Founder Fears End Of Project |
59 |
http://kerneltrap.org/node/7061 |
60 |
|
61 |
-- |
62 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |