1 |
On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Bart Verwilst wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Hmm.. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Great that gentoo is now gcc3.x compliant :o) |
6 |
> But what are the advantages of using gcc 3.x over gcc 2.95.x? |
7 |
> Isn't gcc 3.x slower than 2.95? |
8 |
|
9 |
One of the advantages of gcc 3.x is that it has special optimizations for |
10 |
Athlon processors. Other then that, I'm not too familiar with gcc 3.x. |
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
> |
14 |
> Thanks, great work! |
15 |
> |
16 |
> On Saturday 06 April 2002 14:01, Geert Bevin wrote: |
17 |
> || Hi all, |
18 |
> || |
19 |
> || I finally installed 1.0 from scratch and decided to try it out with gcc |
20 |
> || 3.0.4 instead of 2.95.3. Along the way I encountered some problems, but |
21 |
> || surprisingly little. I've fixed everything that needed fixing and sadly |
22 |
> || some packages are backwards incompatible. For that reason and for the |
23 |
> || ease of maintenance I've created a dedicated gcc 3 profile. |
24 |
> || |
25 |
> || So, for those that want to try this out, just link the default-1.0-gcc3 |
26 |
> || profile instead of default-1.0 to /etc/make.profile. Note that this will |
27 |
> || only work for installations from scratch and not for updates since |
28 |
> || applications that link against libstdc++ v2 require the libraries of gcc |
29 |
> || v2 and not gcc v3. |
30 |
> || |
31 |
> || There are still some packages that don't compile such as galeon and |
32 |
> || openjade, but these will be fixed in a matter of time since I need them |
33 |
> || ;-) Feel free to submit fixes too. |
34 |
> || |
35 |
> || Best regards, |
36 |
> || |
37 |
> || Geert Bevin |
38 |
> |
39 |
> -- |
40 |
> Bart Verwilst |
41 |
> Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team |
42 |
> Gent, Belgium |
43 |
> _______________________________________________ |
44 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
45 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
46 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
47 |
> |
48 |
|
49 |
-- |
50 |
-Joe Oppegaard |
51 |
http://joppegaard.com |