| 1 |
On Monday 05 June 2006 15:58, Luis Medinas wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 21:22 +0200, Wernfried Haas wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 07:03:57PM +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > today I would like to propose a few default keywords for removal. They |
| 5 |
> > > are outdated and no longer needed on current systems: |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > What do you want to remove, the use flags themselves or just turn them |
| 8 |
> > off in the profiles? |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > > -xmms - xmms depends on gtk-1 and has been superseeded by |
| 11 |
> > > audacious/bmpx |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > xmms is still in the tree? People (ok, at least me ;-) ) still use it? |
| 14 |
> > I don't mind if it has to go and there are alternatives, but why would |
| 15 |
> > you just want to remove its use flag and not the package itself? |
| 16 |
> > If it needs to go, either dump all of it or nothing. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Xmms will be removed soon... Lot's of users still use xmms mostly |
| 19 |
> because it has many plugins that others don't. Xmms is still stable but |
| 20 |
> the upstream is dead so it won't take our patchset. In the end of this |
| 21 |
> year i would like to remove xmms and all plugins but before i need to |
| 22 |
> prepare users for this changes and clean some maintainer-wanted bugs for |
| 23 |
> plugins. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
i think removing xmms is inappropriate at this time or in the near future |
| 26 |
-mike |
Archives