| 1 |
Forever. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Gentoo releases mean absolutely nothing, they do absolutely nothing. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
The news should stay until the upgrade occurs |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
On 11/10/05, Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 8 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 9 |
> > On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:07:37 -0800 Mike Owen <kyphros@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 10 |
> > | What about something like "/etc/portage/news.read", which contains a |
| 11 |
> > | single news file per line. Perhaps have support for something like |
| 12 |
> > | "<=2006-01-01" in order to be able to manually mark date ranges as |
| 13 |
> > | read. |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > Eh, yet another file. No real need for it really, it just adds |
| 16 |
> > complexity. |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > Besides, /etc isn't for program-generated data. |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Modify anything within PORTDIR is wrong. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> I'd put a /var/db/news and a /etc/portage/news to handle that. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Which should be a reasonable timeframe for the news to stay? |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Till the next gentoo release? |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> lu |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> -- |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> Luca Barbato |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> Gentoo/linux Developer Gentoo/PPC Operational Leader |
| 36 |
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> -- |
| 39 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives