1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 02.11.2013 14:51, Tom Wijsman wrote: |
5 |
> From what I heard so far this isn't reproducible by the committer; |
6 |
> so, is anyone else being able to reproduce this? I didn't |
7 |
> experience this either; so, maybe this is only reproducible on a |
8 |
> stable system? |
9 |
|
10 |
This one hit me too on several systems: up-to-date arch/~arch mixed |
11 |
system and stable-only systems. I haven't looked into the block that |
12 |
deep but removed the old one and emerged the new one. |
13 |
|
14 |
At work i have several systems now with the block - if someone needs |
15 |
some information, ping me on IRC or via mail. |
16 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
17 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) |
18 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
19 |
|
20 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSdQpDAAoJEKCEBkJ3xQHt58gH/18Ulp6IILZ+Y/h6vqOnVICh |
21 |
dMe1+GMb4tRtph5LzdqTNnziRVQvOclspPfSealgW1VJozgJvYdHaRg/vyHBMarI |
22 |
aMPN4FIB4xw3PcXa/pbdemVU5Mzf+jHnlIz6HRdARxFp/zg3a7DyppPhJy0gObuh |
23 |
5Ah9phraKJLgdmVqDZnG+9vEgn4+2PiLd7SAadR4nY+muL+X+HExxr64xmI4t7Jk |
24 |
FwwyjHgDz558Dd1jZ34oilYXrtDpVcLtCp67S091e/L3lq5vdneF/pxjAkG/bTVH |
25 |
V9VEQKlJ6p0HFpueB57bdLEmhNLSPPwzoAjF1E24Tc+A95PwYBp35G8WW3CoPU0= |
26 |
=5pRK |
27 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |