Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: robbat2@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/3] eclass/go-module: add support for building based on go.sum
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2020 23:53:44
Message-Id: 20200209235336.GA19309@linux1.home
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/3] eclass/go-module: add support for building based on go.sum by "Robin H. Johnson"
1 On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 11:35:25PM +0000, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
2 > On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 04:11:28PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
3 > > On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 12:31:19PM -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
4 > > > +# "go.mod" only:
5 > > > +# - Populate EGO_VENDOR
6 > > go.mod without go.sum can mean that there are no external dependencies, so there
7 > > shouldn't be a reason to populate EGO_VENDOR in this case.
8 > ...
9 > > The way I see this going is to transition to EGO_SUM and
10 > > drop EGO_VENDOR. unless I'm missing something.
11 > I know another corner case for legacy stuff, but let's drop entirely and
12 > encourage migration to EGO_SUM.
13
14 I'm curious, what is the corner case I'm missing?
15
16 Thanks,
17
18 William

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature