Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/3] eclass/go-module: add support for building based on go.sum
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2020 23:35:32
Message-Id: robbat2-20200209T232840-297180162Z@orbis-terrarum.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/3] eclass/go-module: add support for building based on go.sum by William Hubbs
1 On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 04:11:28PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
2 > On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 12:31:19PM -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
3 > > +# "go.mod" only:
4 > > +# - Populate EGO_VENDOR
5 > go.mod without go.sum can mean that there are no external dependencies, so there
6 > shouldn't be a reason to populate EGO_VENDOR in this case.
7 ...
8 > The way I see this going is to transition to EGO_SUM and
9 > drop EGO_VENDOR. unless I'm missing something.
10 I know another corner case for legacy stuff, but let's drop entirely and
11 encourage migration to EGO_SUM.
12
13 --
14 Robin Hugh Johnson
15 Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Treasurer
16 E-Mail : robbat2@g.o
17 GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85
18 GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies