1 |
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:26:18 +0200 |
2 |
Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> |
5 |
> On 20/02/14 10:47, Steev Klimaszewski wrote: |
6 |
> > On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 10:40 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
7 |
> >> On 20/02/14 09:44, Steev Klimaszewski wrote: |
8 |
> >>> On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 07:55 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
9 |
> >>>> On 20/02/14 00:23, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
10 |
> >>>>> Following up to today's QA meeting: The gtk3 USE flag is used by |
11 |
> >>>>> 27 packages, so I suggest making it a global flag: |
12 |
> >>>>> |
13 |
> >>>>> gtk3 - Add support for x11-libs/gtk+ (The GIMP Toolkit) version |
14 |
> >>>>> 3 |
15 |
> >>>>> |
16 |
> >>>>> Ulrich |
17 |
> >>>> that would suggest it's fine to use, and is anything but |
18 |
> >>>> temporary |
19 |
> >>>> |
20 |
> >>>> -1 from here |
21 |
> >>>> |
22 |
> >>> MATE desktop (which I hope to bring in to Portage soon) can be |
23 |
> >>> built against gtk+ 2 or gtk+ 3, and upstream supports doing both, |
24 |
> >>> so +1 from me. Just because gtk+ 3 is the latest, does not mean |
25 |
> >>> it's the greatest, and I really wish people would realize that |
26 |
> >>> newest != bestest. |
27 |
> >>> |
28 |
> >>> |
29 |
> >> Then you pick whatever is best supported for MATE, and ship it |
30 |
> >> using that. Later when they have completed their support for |
31 |
> >> GTK+-3, and it's the best supported, you ship that. It's not |
32 |
> >> rocket science. |
33 |
> >> |
34 |
> > OR, since I'm the maintainer, I decide that I'm willing to deal with |
35 |
> > both, instead of you telling me that I need to pick one or the |
36 |
> > other. Upstream says both are supported and viable, and I'm willing |
37 |
> > to deal with the headaches. Just because you're unwilling doesn't |
38 |
> > mean others aren't. kthx. |
39 |
> > |
40 |
> > |
41 |
> |
42 |
> Bye bye distribution level consistency :-( |
43 |
> |
44 |
> It's sad that few stubborn developers can do that. |
45 |
> |
46 |
> - Samuli |
47 |
> |
48 |
|
49 |
"'Ey! Have you heard about it. Gentoo doesn't provide X with support |
50 |
for Y, then what are their USE flags even for; what a shame, ..." |
51 |
|
52 |
If people want to support and use multiple things, let them do so. It is |
53 |
pretty much what Gentoo and its philosophy are about; which somewhat |
54 |
can be summarized as providing choices such that we fit the users' |
55 |
need, and not force our one true way upon them... |
56 |
|
57 |
Greetings from someone who runs GNOME 3 and MATE simultaneously; you can |
58 |
intentionally break it, but why would you? It takes away our happiness. |
59 |
On the other hand, there's the part where you want to break it for a |
60 |
reason, perhaps for your happiness; but then I'd like to hear why. |
61 |
|
62 |
-- |
63 |
With kind regards, |
64 |
|
65 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
66 |
Gentoo Developer |
67 |
|
68 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
69 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
70 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |