1 |
On 20/02/14 10:47, Steev Klimaszewski wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 10:40 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
3 |
>> On 20/02/14 09:44, Steev Klimaszewski wrote: |
4 |
>>> On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 07:55 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
5 |
>>>> On 20/02/14 00:23, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
6 |
>>>>> Following up to today's QA meeting: The gtk3 USE flag is used by |
7 |
>>>>> 27 packages, so I suggest making it a global flag: |
8 |
>>>>> |
9 |
>>>>> gtk3 - Add support for x11-libs/gtk+ (The GIMP Toolkit) version 3 |
10 |
>>>>> |
11 |
>>>>> Ulrich |
12 |
>>>> that would suggest it's fine to use, and is anything but temporary |
13 |
>>>> |
14 |
>>>> -1 from here |
15 |
>>>> |
16 |
>>> MATE desktop (which I hope to bring in to Portage soon) can be built |
17 |
>>> against gtk+ 2 or gtk+ 3, and upstream supports doing both, so +1 from |
18 |
>>> me. Just because gtk+ 3 is the latest, does not mean it's the greatest, |
19 |
>>> and I really wish people would realize that newest != bestest. |
20 |
>>> |
21 |
>>> |
22 |
>> Then you pick whatever is best supported for MATE, and ship it using that. |
23 |
>> Later when they have completed their support for GTK+-3, and it's the |
24 |
>> best supported, you ship that. It's not rocket science. |
25 |
>> |
26 |
> OR, since I'm the maintainer, I decide that I'm willing to deal with |
27 |
> both, instead of you telling me that I need to pick one or the other. |
28 |
> Upstream says both are supported and viable, and I'm willing to deal |
29 |
> with the headaches. Just because you're unwilling doesn't mean others |
30 |
> aren't. kthx. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> |
33 |
|
34 |
Bye bye distribution level consistency :-( |
35 |
|
36 |
It's sad that few stubborn developers can do that. |
37 |
|
38 |
- Samuli |