| 1 |
Am Freitag, 18. Januar 2013, 23:20:50 schrieben Sie: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 21:37:10 +0100 |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > FYI, the new 13.0 profiles are now all available in profiles.desc, for |
| 6 |
> > now all with status "dev" (i.e. repoman includes them only when you |
| 7 |
> > request developer profile checking). |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > This means the procedure below is complete up to and including point 5) |
| 10 |
> > now. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > Please consider changing your profile symlink manually and testing the |
| 13 |
> > new profile tree. In case of problems, please file a bug and assign it |
| 14 |
> > to me (or tell me if I'm around). |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > If all goes well, we'll continue in a week. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Hmm, I think we need a bit more fine-grained EAPI=5 directories, at |
| 19 |
> least for arch-specific unmasks. Not sure if I shall use the |
| 20 |
> arch-specific 13.0 profiles or something more common shall be |
| 21 |
> introduced. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I think it's perfectly fine now to raise the EAPI to 5 anywhere in the profile |
| 24 |
trees that (also) inherit 13.0 (since they need it anyway). |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
So, in my opinion, we can just do that wherever needed. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
The intention of the "eapi-5-files" directory is just to hold the files that |
| 29 |
will be moved into global scale once the old profiles are gone. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Andreas K. Huettel |
| 34 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
| 35 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 36 |
http://www.akhuettel.de/ |
Archives