| 1 |
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 06:05:53PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> > Afaicr, the infinity sign will be kept, but I know a huge discussion |
| 3 |
> > will be held on this. It's not important in this stage of the |
| 4 |
> > development though... |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> And now we're told that it *was* important at that stage and it's too |
| 7 |
> late to change things? Riiiiiiight. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I said that in that stage of the redesign development the logo discussion |
| 11 |
shouldn't be held as it is part of the design "the infinity sign will be |
| 12 |
kept" but that we leave it open for discussion if enough shoulders are put |
| 13 |
under it ("huge discussion"). |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
The primary concern at that stage of the development was to continue to |
| 16 |
develop the design/XSL so that we have something workable when we offer the |
| 17 |
design to the public... which is now. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Like I said before, I rather like the infinity sign. The trustees have had a |
| 20 |
discussion on this part too. Their decision was that we need a "strong, |
| 21 |
compelling case for not using it since it is something the community has |
| 22 |
voted on". |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Wkr, |
| 25 |
Sven Vermeulen |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Gentoo Foundation Trustee | http://foundation.gentoo.org |
| 29 |
Gentoo Documentation Project Lead | http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gdp |
| 30 |
Gentoo Council Member |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
The Gentoo Project <<< http://www.gentoo.org >>> |
Archives