| 1 |
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 20:49:47 +0100 Henrik Brix Andersen |
| 2 |
<brix@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
| On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 04:57:11PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
| > I did bring this up a year ago. I brought it up before the close of |
| 5 |
| > voting too. Back then, it was claimed that the infinity was just a |
| 6 |
| > minor detail and not part of the design itself. |
| 7 |
| |
| 8 |
| Yes, I remember that - I just can't locate it in the archives. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
It was on -core. But there was a nice forums post too. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Sven Vermeulen writes at http://tinyurl.com/amyy3 : |
| 13 |
> Afaicr, the infinity sign will be kept, but I know a huge discussion |
| 14 |
> will be held on this. It's not important in this stage of the |
| 15 |
> development though... |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
And now we're told that it *was* important at that stage and it's too |
| 18 |
late to change things? Riiiiiiight. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!) |
| 22 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 23 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Archives