| 1 |
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:54:36 +0000 Luke-Jr <luke-jr@×××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
| > Not a chance for 2.0.51 final as that should be out in a few hours. |
| 3 |
| > You're probably right on the LICENSE stuff being unmanageable |
| 4 |
| > without groups. It'll first go into a 2.0.52_preX and possibly be |
| 5 |
| > backported to a 2.0.51pX. |
| 6 |
| |
| 7 |
| How do you figure LICENSE stuff being unmanageable? Wasn't part of it |
| 8 |
| to have unACCEPTed LICENSEs prompt for approval on emerging? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Portage should never rely upon being interactive. The option's there for |
| 11 |
those who explicitly ask for it. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, Sparc, Mips) |
| 15 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 16 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Archives