| 1 |
On Wednesday 20 October 2004 1:55 pm, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tuesday 19 October 2004 00:34, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
> > | BTW, may as well keep the grouping discussion here. In fact, it might |
| 4 |
> > | be best to remove grouping from the ACCEPT_LICENSE GLEP so as to get |
| 5 |
> > | the rest of it finalized. See how time goes, I guess... |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > You aiming for .51 on that? Personally I don't see the LICENCE stuff |
| 8 |
> > being usable without some form of grouping... |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Not a chance for 2.0.51 final as that should be out in a few hours. You're |
| 11 |
> probably right on the LICENSE stuff being unmanageable without groups. |
| 12 |
> It'll first go into a 2.0.52_preX and possibly be backported to a 2.0.51pX. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
How do you figure LICENSE stuff being unmanageable? Wasn't part of it to have |
| 15 |
unACCEPTed LICENSEs prompt for approval on emerging? |
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Luke-Jr |
| 18 |
Developer, Utopios |
| 19 |
http://utopios.org/ |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives