| 1 |
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> I had just given some reasons above, in the part that you haven't |
| 4 |
> quoted. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
My main issue was with the "burden of proof" bit. This isn't a court |
| 8 |
- we're free to do whatever seems to make the most sense, and not |
| 9 |
worry about what kind of precedent it sets, since the next Council can |
| 10 |
do whatever makes the most sense at that time. :) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I'm all for something that covers the bases but is a bit cleaner in |
| 13 |
design. Right now we have different sources for membership lists of |
| 14 |
different kinds of groups, and that just seems like poor |
| 15 |
normalization. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Rich |
Archives