| 1 |
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 10:15, Thomas M. Beaudry wrote: |
| 2 |
> But what is the point in the above example? None and the "using |
| 3 |
> namespace" form works just fine. In fact it could be the prefered |
| 4 |
> form on a large program with a simple namespace schema. The reason |
| 5 |
> for this is the simple fact that working memory can only hold on |
| 6 |
> average 12 items. By not having the objects prefixed with their |
| 7 |
> namespace you can hold more code in working memory when, for example, |
| 8 |
> debugging, making the job easier on you. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
It also makes it easier when a lot of developers are working with the |
| 11 |
same base code. Some function and class can get the same name and even |
| 12 |
parameters. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
/Kim |
Archives