| 1 |
On Mon, 2020-04-13 at 21:39 +0300, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote: |
| 2 |
> > +Transitional architectures are generally listed after stable architectures, |
| 3 |
> > +possibly mixed with testing. Developers are not expected to file |
| 4 |
> > stabilization +requests. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I'm still claiming that it would be more useful to have the stable requests |
| 7 |
> for transitional arches, even if we explicitly state that they can't block |
| 8 |
> anything. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Otherwise these arches will never be able to get out of the transitional hole. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> [Maybe someone who actually does slow-arch work should speak up. Anyone out |
| 13 |
> there still reading g-dev?] |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I'm lost. The original definition said that this state is for arches |
| 17 |
that use stable only on subset of packages needed for stage building. |
| 18 |
Why would people file streqs for other packages then? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Best regards, |
| 22 |
Michał Górny |
Archives