Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Andreas K. Hüttel" <dilfridge@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v3 6/9] glep-0072: Combine and amend description of states
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 18:39:21
Message-Id: 2049431.hkbZ0PkbqX@farino
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v3 6/9] glep-0072: Combine and amend description of states by "Michał Górny"
1 > +Transitional architectures are generally listed after stable architectures,
2 > +possibly mixed with testing. Developers are not expected to file
3 > stabilization +requests.
4
5 I'm still claiming that it would be more useful to have the stable requests
6 for transitional arches, even if we explicitly state that they can't block
7 anything.
8
9 Otherwise these arches will never be able to get out of the transitional hole.
10
11 [Maybe someone who actually does slow-arch work should speak up. Anyone out
12 there still reading g-dev?]
13
14 --
15 Andreas K. Hüttel
16 dilfridge@g.o
17 Gentoo Linux developer
18 (council, qa, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies