| 1 |
On 01/03/14 08:40, Steven J. Long wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 07:20:24AM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 3 |
>> If only Portage had supported checking if files from /usr were used by |
| 4 |
>> files installed to / |
| 5 |
>> Hard to create check for every case, but something like libraries and NEEDED |
| 6 |
>> entries (bug 443590) would have been a start |
| 7 |
>> But there simply wasn't enough popular demand for sep. /usr, so nobody |
| 8 |
>> was willing to do the work |
| 9 |
> Actually when I proposed working on exactly that (twice), for both initramfs |
| 10 |
> and traditional usr setups, you and mgorny shouted me down, diverting it into |
| 11 |
> a discussion about how I was a "hater" for not seeing why I should change |
| 12 |
> anything on my systems. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I don't remember anything of that sort. I may have overlooked at |
| 15 |
your suggestion and replied to other part of your post, but I certainly |
| 16 |
haven't said such checks would be a bad idea. |
| 17 |
I don't appericiate the twisting of history. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> Neat bit of revisionism though; I almost thought you cared about us old |
| 20 |
> fusties for a moment there. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I don't appericiate the attempt of trying to categorize me into one |
| 24 |
of these pro-, anti-, {systemd,udev,eudev,sep. /usr,whatever} camps. |
| 25 |
I wonder, did you notice who filed bug 443590 to begin with? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
- Samuli |
Archives