| 1 |
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 11:28:33AM +0100, Grobian wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
> >Motivation |
| 4 |
> >========== |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> >There are currently several ways of getting news out to our users, none of |
| 7 |
> >them |
| 8 |
> >particularly effective: |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> This assumes the following ways are really ineffective, something which |
| 11 |
> you don't prove or give any reason for. Hence it's eligable for another |
| 12 |
> big discussion. To avoid that, I would suggest to add a number of |
| 13 |
> reasons, or whatever to make this assumption sound (more) valid. It is |
| 14 |
> important, I think, that the reader can understand your grounds for |
| 15 |
> saying this. |
| 16 |
> (I personally disagree on this statement now, but it makes no use |
| 17 |
> discussing it since you haven't given any ground as on why. Maybe if |
| 18 |
> you would give a definition, I could adjust my own definition and agree.) |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
You must not have read the [#forums-whining]_ reference as that makes it |
| 21 |
quite clear that existing methods isn't adequate. Even if you think the |
| 22 |
apache maintainers made lots of mistakes you can't really fault us for |
| 23 |
not trying to get the news of config changes out to all users. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Regards, |
| 26 |
Bryan Østergaard |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives