| 1 |
kloeri@g.o wrote: |
| 2 |
> You must not have read the [#forums-whining]_ reference as that makes it |
| 3 |
> quite clear that existing methods isn't adequate. Even if you think the |
| 4 |
> apache maintainers made lots of mistakes you can't really fault us for |
| 5 |
> not trying to get the news of config changes out to all users. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I haven't, that's correct. However, a reference should be a source for |
| 8 |
additional information. A small exerpt or recap of that thread is not |
| 9 |
in the GLEP. Also, [#forums-whining]_ was not referenced in the quoted |
| 10 |
part, the reference only follows later on. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Going into answering your question, the thread suggests for instance an |
| 13 |
RSS-feed with this info. Also the GLEP mentions 5 distinct sources, of |
| 14 |
which I personally think at least two will be effective for a certain |
| 15 |
group of people. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
That last thing was what I was aiming at. For some it might work quite |
| 18 |
well if the apache2 upgrade stuff (as sent out on gentoo-dev) was |
| 19 |
communicated through gentoo-announce. Hence my doubts on whether "[they |
| 20 |
are not] particularly effective" is a general statement that applies to |
| 21 |
any situation. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 26 |
Gentoo for Mac OS X Project -- Interim Lead |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives