Archives
Archives
| From: | "Marcin Mirosław" <marcin@×××××.pl> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Why is IUSE=hpn mandatory in openssh ? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 08 Apr 2014 18:35:08 | ||
| Message-Id: | 53444147.3090106@mejor.pl | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Why is IUSE=hpn mandatory in openssh ? by "Toralf Förster" |
||
| 1 | W dniu 2014-03-31 19:35, Toralf Förster pisze: |
| 2 | > On 03/31/2014 01:15 PM, Alex Xu wrote: |
| 3 | >> On 31/03/14 03:36 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: |
| 4 | >>> So, I'm interested... How widely used is the HPN patch set? Are there |
| 5 | >>> any good indications that it doesn't negatively impact security? |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=292932 |
| 8 | >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693424 |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2007-July/105570.html |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openssh-hpn/ |
| 13 | > |
| 14 | >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/162253 |
| 15 | > |
| 16 | > |
| 17 | > Those bug reports are good arguments to have HPN as a feature in openssh. |
| 18 | > |
| 19 | > And most of them now many years old and still open. |
| 20 | > |
| 21 | > That's an argument to rethink if HPN should be activated quietly. |
| 22 | |
| 23 | According to last problem with openssl and +tls-heartbeat I'd like to |
| 24 | see less features enabled by default. USE="-*" isn't the best solution;) |
| 25 | |
| 26 | Marcin |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Why is IUSE=hpn mandatory in openssh ? | Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> |