Archives
Archives
| From: | "Toralf Förster" <toralf.foerster@×××.de> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Why is IUSE=hpn mandatory in openssh ? | ||
| Date: | Mon, 31 Mar 2014 17:36:00 | ||
| Message-Id: | 5339A774.2090707@gmx.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Why is IUSE=hpn mandatory in openssh ? by Alex Xu |
||
| 1 | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 | Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 | |
| 4 | On 03/31/2014 01:15 PM, Alex Xu wrote: |
| 5 | > On 31/03/14 03:36 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: |
| 6 | >> So, I'm interested... How widely used is the HPN patch set? Are there |
| 7 | >> any good indications that it doesn't negatively impact security? |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=292932 |
| 10 | > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693424 |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2007-July/105570.html |
| 13 | > |
| 14 | > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openssh-hpn/ |
| 15 | > |
| 16 | > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/162253 |
| 17 | > |
| 18 | |
| 19 | Those bug reports are good arguments to have HPN as a feature in openssh. |
| 20 | |
| 21 | And most of them now many years old and still open. |
| 22 | |
| 23 | That's an argument to rethink if HPN should be activated quietly. |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 26 | - -- |
| 27 | MfG/Sincerely |
| 28 | Toralf Förster |
| 29 | pgp finger print:1A37 6F99 4A9D 026F 13E2 4DCF C4EA CDDE 0076 E94E |
| 30 | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 31 | Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) |
| 32 | Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
| 33 | |
| 34 | iF4EAREIAAYFAlM5p3QACgkQxOrN3gB26U6MqAD/RYVZv8On17mFPrVW324H7DxT |
| 35 | pkhSnIOCr/WEn1OaLaQA/3F4zjXdCvV0i7R56KeVunef/Wb7o68yHi9EBmKnfrZn |
| 36 | =NdCj |
| 37 | -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Why is IUSE=hpn mandatory in openssh ? | "Marcin Mirosław" <marcin@×××××.pl> |