| 1 |
Hi Luca, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On 1/9/06, Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> that's an useflag you may use it or not, webapps use webapp-config that |
| 5 |
> already handles /srv w/out any problem, having the base webroot using |
| 6 |
> srvdir would be nice so you spare a couple of mv but that's all... |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> lu |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I haven't read GLEP 20 for some time now, so my apologies if this is |
| 11 |
clear in my original draft. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
My original intention for the srvdir USE flag was to cope with these |
| 14 |
two situations: |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
a) Apps that have compile-time paths that can't be overridden w/ |
| 17 |
runtime configuration |
| 18 |
b) Apps that have runtime configuration, which we could setup to work |
| 19 |
with /srv out of the box. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I don't believe that it's practical to specify a layout for /srv that |
| 22 |
fits everyone. I use /srv/<fqdn>/<service> on some of the boxes I |
| 23 |
look after, but some of them run /srv/<customer>/<fqdn>/<service> |
| 24 |
instead. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Which packages do you want to add the srvdir global USE flag for? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Best regards, |
| 29 |
Stu |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives