Archives
Archives
| From: | Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] arch-cruft in use.mask makes me angry | ||
| Date: | Wed, 05 Jul 2006 08:41:47 | ||
| Message-Id: | 44AB78B1.3040006@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] arch-cruft in use.mask makes me angry by Mike Frysinger |
||
| 1 | Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 | > can someone remind me why our arch USE flags are in an "opt-out" system rather |
| 3 | > than "opt-in" ? instead of adding things like: |
| 4 | > dmi |
| 5 | > icc |
| 6 | > mmx |
| 7 | > svga |
| 8 | > ... |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | > to every non-x86 profile, why dont we mask these things in base/use.mask and |
| 11 | > then un-mask them in default-linux/x86 ? doesnt that make more sense ? |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Yes. I've tried to do things this way with modular X. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Thanks, |
| 16 | Donnie |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |