| 1 |
El lun, 14-09-2015 a las 00:19 +0300, Andrew Savchenko escribió: |
| 2 |
[...] |
| 3 |
> Yes, but as long as choice of core components and infrastructure is |
| 4 |
> free one. Read Gentoo Social Contract: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> https://www.gentoo.org/get-started/philosophy/social-contract.html |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> "However, Gentoo will never depend upon a piece of software or |
| 9 |
> metadata unless it conforms to the GNU General Public License, the |
| 10 |
> GNU Lesser General Public License, the Creative Commons - |
| 11 |
> Attribution/Share Alike or some other license approved by the Open |
| 12 |
> Source Initiative (OSI)." |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> What actually happens now is that several individual are trying to |
| 15 |
> undermine this concept and to tie Gentoo to the proprietary |
| 16 |
> metadata. And some point this dependence will become irreversible. |
| 17 |
> It is a pain for me to see that several developers under disguise of |
| 18 |
> "community" and "integration" are trying hard to make that happen, |
| 19 |
> step by step. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Best regards, |
| 22 |
> Andrew Savchenko |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I completely disagree with you pointing to some concrete people and |
| 25 |
accusing them about they trying to break the social contract. I see no |
| 26 |
proof at all to support your accusation, and I think you should refrain |
| 27 |
from doing that kind of accusations without any base. If you have any |
| 28 |
kind of "proof" supporting that accusations, please explain them |
| 29 |
briefly, otherwise this looks just like trolling to me :/ |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
The only thing I see here is some people trying to mirror github and |
| 32 |
bugzilla, and that will likely help a lot of people (like me) that |
| 33 |
don't use github, letting people that need their features to work with |
| 34 |
other people that don't need or don't want to use it. What is the |
| 35 |
problem then? :| Why people tend to think that others have obscure |
| 36 |
intentions or similar? Isn't much easier to think that all people here |
| 37 |
are contributing for free for the sake of improving things? Why do we |
| 38 |
need to be so rude when discussing things on mailing lists or IRC? I am |
| 39 |
sure that if we could meet in the "real life", face to face, we would |
| 40 |
see that there are no conspiracies and no obscure intentions and most |
| 41 |
of the arguments come from misunderstandings, overreactions and similar |
| 42 |
:| |
Archives