| 1 |
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 22:13:30 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:07:26 +0300 |
| 3 |
> Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:21:02 +0200 hasufell wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > On 09/13/2015 07:56 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > > Gentoo workflow should not depend on a proprietary tools like |
| 7 |
> > > > github issue tracker and github pull requests. |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > It doesn't. That's what this thread is about, so people who refuse |
| 10 |
> > > to collaborate on github PRs can still collaborate on bugzilla. |
| 11 |
> > > |
| 12 |
> > > Also, in case you don't know, the github issue tracker is |
| 13 |
> > > _deactivated_. |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > I'm aware of that, but from this thread I see that some people are |
| 16 |
> > trying to activate it. I hope this will never happen. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> But Gentoo is about choice! |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Yes, but as long as choice of core components and infrastructure is |
| 21 |
free one. Read Gentoo Social Contract: |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
https://www.gentoo.org/get-started/philosophy/social-contract.html |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
"However, Gentoo will never depend upon a piece of software or |
| 26 |
metadata unless it conforms to the GNU General Public License, the |
| 27 |
GNU Lesser General Public License, the Creative Commons - |
| 28 |
Attribution/Share Alike or some other license approved by the Open |
| 29 |
Source Initiative (OSI)." |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
What actually happens now is that several individual are trying to |
| 32 |
undermine this concept and to tie Gentoo to the proprietary |
| 33 |
metadata. And some point this dependence will become irreversible. |
| 34 |
It is a pain for me to see that several developers under disguise of |
| 35 |
"community" and "integration" are trying hard to make that happen, |
| 36 |
step by step. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Best regards, |
| 39 |
Andrew Savchenko |
Archives