| 1 |
On 09/13/2015 11:19 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Yes, but as long as choice of core components and infrastructure is |
| 4 |
> free one. Read Gentoo Social Contract: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> https://www.gentoo.org/get-started/philosophy/social-contract.html |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> "However, Gentoo will never depend upon a piece of software or |
| 9 |
> metadata unless it conforms to the GNU General Public License, the |
| 10 |
> GNU Lesser General Public License, the Creative Commons - |
| 11 |
> Attribution/Share Alike or some other license approved by the Open |
| 12 |
> Source Initiative (OSI)." |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> What actually happens now is that several individual are trying to |
| 15 |
> undermine this concept and to tie Gentoo to the proprietary |
| 16 |
> metadata. And some point this dependence will become irreversible. |
| 17 |
> It is a pain for me to see that several developers under disguise of |
| 18 |
> "community" and "integration" are trying hard to make that happen, |
| 19 |
> step by step. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
You are demotivating and offending a lot of people who have worked hard |
| 23 |
on improving collaboration in gentoo. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Github usage is totally optional. Most of what you say makes really zero |
| 26 |
sense. Please stop and try to actually read the thread. |
Archives