| 1 |
Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o> said: |
| 2 |
> On Thursday 09 February 2006 09:30, Mark Loeser wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o> said: |
| 4 |
> > > It was my understanding that it is needed for the 3.3 -> 3.4 upgrade. |
| 5 |
> > > Various packages that will build fine against either are broken until |
| 6 |
> > > being recompiled after the upgrade and there is currently no way to |
| 7 |
> > > express this with dependencies. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > You need either gcc-3.3 or libstdc++-v3. I don't see forcing either upon our |
| 10 |
> > users to be a good thing. The upgrade doc covers how to do the 3.3->3.4 |
| 11 |
> > upgrade, and I think most archs are on 3.4 at this point. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Ok. If the there's an upgrade doc and 3.4 postinst points to it, no problem. |
| 14 |
> I take it the dependencies you're asking about is for binary-only (or other?) |
| 15 |
> packages that specifically depend on 3.3 then? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Nothing should explicitly depend on gcc-3.3 to compile. If that is the |
| 18 |
case, let me know and I'll try and patch the package. I am specifically |
| 19 |
asking for binary only packages that require libstdc++-v3 to depend on the |
| 20 |
virtual/libstdc++-3.3. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
The doc is in the gcc-3.4 postinst: |
| 23 |
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gcc-upgrading.xml |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Mark Loeser - Gentoo Developer (cpp gcc-porting toolchain x86) |
| 27 |
email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org |
| 28 |
mark AT halcy0n DOT com |
| 29 |
web - http://dev.gentoo.org/~halcy0n/ |
| 30 |
http://www.halcy0n.com |
Archives